Hegemony Is Not a Policy. It Is an Identity.

Somewhere in Washington, among the people with security clearance, are those who know that the Iran war is lost. They know the forward air bases in the Gulf are rubble, that the Fifth Fleet’s headquarters in Bahrain no longer exists, that the carriers have been pushed so far offshore their aircraft spend more time transiting than fighting. They know Saudi Arabia began this war with roughly 2,800 Patriot interceptors and finished the first forty days with 400. They know the United States produces something like eighteen SM-3 interceptors a year and fired a tenth of its remaining Patriot stockpile in a single exchange defending a base in Jordan. They know that after thirteen thousand strikes during the first forty days of war the mobile launchers and the missile cities are still there, turning out new missiles under the mountains, and that the only targets left are civilian.

Somewhere in Langley, a person who has spent years working alongside Ukrainian intelligence knows the same thing about that war. He has watched the conscription videos and knows the interceptors Kyiv is begging for are the same interceptors the Gulf just burned through. He knows that the two emissaries who spent three hours and ten minutes with Vladimir Putin inevitably left with nothing, because Moscow had already agreed to terms at Anchorage and then watched Washington walk away from them.

And yet the wars continue. Perhaps a million people are dead in Ukraine. Schoolgirls were killed in Minab. Every rational cost-benefit analysis was settled months ago. So the question worth asking is not whether the people in charge understand that they have lost. At least some of them do. The question is why understanding changes nothing.

The usual answer is pride, and pride is part of it. Admitting defeat to Iran, a country the American establishment has spent decades describing as a pariah, is a humiliation of a kind Donald Trump’s self-image cannot absorb. But pride alone would have cracked by now. Pride is a personal failing, and personal failings can be outvoted, outlasted, and replaced. What we are watching is more durable than any one man’s vanity. It is institutional, and beneath the institutions it is something closer to theology.

Boris Johnson said it out loud: what is at stake in Ukraine is Western hegemony itself. He was right, and the candor was unusual. For the people who run American and European foreign policy, primacy is not one goal among many, to be weighed against the cost of ammunition or the price of diesel. It is the ground on which every other goal stands. It is not what they do. It is who they are.

Read more

Continue the conversation on CATR →